Meet DotEEBubble, The Mysterious Estonian Startup Critic Who Throws Cold Water On Government-Backed Ventures

Posted: June 17, 2013 in Enterprise, Government, GT, Startup

DotEEBubble is one of the most controversial startup
blogs in the world and you’ve probably never heard of
it. In the rah-rah world of entrepreneurs, accelerators,
and incubators, it’s rare to see much talk about the
problems with the government-funded VC model and
how the biggest players look more like scamsters than bootstrapping entrepreneurs. That’s just what
this blog is – a cold, hard look at the problems that
come when you throw big money at little ideas. The blog, written by an anonymous commenter in
Estonia, is a cross between a research-heavy
economists report and a jeremiad against what looks
to be a EU-funded startup bubble. With excitement
rising about ventures throughout the EU, the site’s
calm, reasoned take on Estonia’s darlings is stirring up quite a bit of controversy in the small country. One startup that we prominently covered,, a
clothing fit “startup” that uses robotic mannequins to
show you what clothes will look like on your body,
took 3,773,456 euros of government money over the
past few years. The company has been in business
for seven years in total and its customer implementations are either well-hidden or nonexistent.
In short, the company looks like a dog. DotEEBubble
writes: In summary, we have a company that has been
around for many years with little success, a
questionable product, and few customers. This
doesn’t seem like a recipe for success.We could be
wrong of course. Maybe a large retailer like Amazon
will just buy them out. Maybe robot mannequins will take over the world, and form the new ruling class.
The future is hard to predict.
The blogger who runs the site refused to be named in
this piece but he took a bit of time to explain his
methodology, his beliefs, and the reasons behind his
thorough takedowns of what he sees as excesses in the Estonian startup market. It would be interesting to
see a similar tack taken in other markets. His model
could be exported but it’s clear his style and intensity
can’t be matched. John Biggs: Why are you doing this? DotEEBubble: Many in Estonia have been trying to
pitch the country as the “startup nation,” but the
details paint quite a different picture. In talking with
some other business people in Estonia, I started
realizing a lot of this is not quite what they make it
out to be. A lot of the startup community and companies are propped up through taxpayer money,
much of it from the EU. What’s worse is that no one in the media was
bothering look under the covers to realize how much
of this was built through public funds. I decided to
start the blog to bring some of these companies to
light. Estonia receives a massive amount of EU funding
(more than 18% of the 2012 budget), and I think
they’ve chosen to spend too much of it on risky
startup companies and startup incubators. It reminds
me of the .com days in the US in the late 90’s, when
there was too much money chasing too few good ideas. The difference is that in Estonia, the money is
coming from taxpayers and not private investors. I would not be so critical of this use of public funds if
everything else was going well in Estonia, but it’s not.
Estonia has the lowest GDP (per capita) in the
eurozone, and its people are the second poorest
among eurozone members when measured by assets
held per person. There is a television show (Kodutunne) on an Estonian television channel that is
similar to Extreme Makeover : Home Edition in the
US. They pick out a needy family in a rural area and
renovate their house. The difference is that in the
Estonian version, most of these families live in
homes without indoor plumbing or hot water! It’s unconscionable that there are people living in these
conditions while at the same time the government is
giving millions to risky startup companies. I think they
need to reconsider their priorities when it comes to
public spending. It was eye-opening what we uncovered. In one case,
a company set up in both Estonia and the UK at the
same time, in order to take advantage of taxpayer-
funded support intended for companies in each
region. Another company we wrote about got millions
of euros, over the course of many years, to fund robotic mannequins. In many cases, the companies that received
government money were being run by people with no
experience in the field. We wrote about an incubator
for gaming startups, where none of the people running
the incubator had ever worked in the gaming industry!
Then there was the incubator that received nearly 700,000 euros from the government to set up in a
small town of 20,000 people to promote creative arts
startups, which as far as we can tell was just a few
women making dresses and jewelry. We also wrote about a private equity fund with more
than 100 million euros under management, that
received over 100,000 euros from the government to
market their fund abroad. Do they really need this
kind of aid? The main criticism is this is all being done with
taxpayer money. If private investors want to spend
their money on these companies, that’s fine with me.
That’s how it seems to work in almost every other
country. JB: Who are you? DEEB: There is more than one person behind the
blog, though I am the primary author of most of the
posts. I own a successful Estonian software
company, and we built it through hard work and
without government handouts. I’ve been in the tech
industry for many years, so I was around to witness the dot-com crash in the US that happened a number
of years ago. None of the people behind the blog have any stake in
any of the companies profiled on the blog, so we have
nothing to gain or lose when these companies do well
or poorly. I like to see startups in Estonia do well,
which is why I mentor some companies and also give
training sessions. I never accept any payment or stake in the company for it. It’s my way of giving
back to the community. JB: What can governments do to fix these sorts of
problems? Should they be investing at all? DEEB: One of the co-founders of TechStars, Brad
Feld,wrote a good post about why the government
should not be in the incubator business, and I agree
with him. As for the government investing in startups, I can
only see it being necessary in rare cases, like in
cases where there are externalities involved that
benefit the public. One example would be a new type
of clean energy technology that may not be profitable
on its own, but with environmental benefits to society that make it worthwhile. This isn’t what is happening in Estonia though. The
companies we have profiled on our blog include a
social network for household pets, and a browser-
based e-book reader. The government shouldn’t be
wasting money on these types of ventures. By our
estimates, the largest investor in Estonian startups in 2012 was the taxpayer. They poured more money into
Estonian startups than all private equity combined. Some will say that the reason the government is
stepping in is that there is no private equity market. I
disagree. Good ideas will always find funding, and
there’s even an Estonian Venture Capital Association
with plenty of members. JB: What is the primary problem in the .ee
environment? Is it widespread? DEEB: Imagine opening up the newspaper every
summer and reading about how many schools will not
open their doors again in September due to lack of
enrollment. That’s actually what happens in Estonia. The Estonian population is rapidly declining, through a
mix of emigration, low birth rate, and low life
expectancy. It ranks 228 out of 232 countries when it
comes to population growth. Net emigration last year
was over 6,600 people, and the majority of those were
people in the 20-34 age group i.e., people in their prime working years. This may not seem like a large
number, but Estonia is a small country with a
population of less than 1.3 million. Last year, the total
number of students in 12th grade was 7,810. Imagine
if 85% of all fresh high school graduates in the US left
the country the day after graduation, and that gives a better idea of the impact. The government isn’t doing much to address the
problem, though I think this is common in many
countries with long-term demographic problems. It’s
easier to ignore it since the impact is not immediate
or sudden. Admittedly, it’s a tough problem to solve. My theory
is that a lot of the emigration is driven by quality of
life issues. That’s not easy to fix, but throwing money
at startup companies does not seem like the solution. JB: Are people mad at you? DEEB: The main criticism we receive is that the
blog’s authors are anonymous, but I think this is from
people eager to attack the messenger because it’s
difficult to attack the message. We’re very careful
with our fact checking and post links to our source
material. As for the reason we’re all anonymous, it’s important
to understand that Estonia is a small country, and all
members of the startup community could easily fit in
a high school auditorium. The community is too
close-knit to write what we do any other way.
Besides, none of us need the fame. We’d rather readers focus on the message not the messenger. Other than the criticism about anonymity, the
feedback we’ve received has been quite positive, and
readers tell us that this is the first time anyone has
bothered to analyze the startup community in Estonia
with a critical eye. We’ve heard that many high-
ranking Estonian government officials are regular readers of our blog, and it’s also required reading in
some entrepreneurship courses in Estonian
universities. JB: So what do you like in Estonia? DEEB: Estonia is a great place to first launch a new
product or technology, because the country’s small
size makes it easy to implement. For example, let’s
say you’ve come up with a personal finance tool that
requires access to the user’s spending details from
their bank account. In Estonia, there are only five consumer banks, so it’s easy to set up those
relationships since you only have to talk to five
banks. One cool thing in Estonia is how the government is so
open and online. It makes it easy for people to track
what’s going on and get information. In fact, so much
data about government spending is online that if we
can’t find information about government spending on
a project after 5 minutes of searching, then that’s a sign that the project manager may be trying to hide
their spending, and it makes us more likely to write
about them.

  1. 989469 213443Hi! Someone in my Facebook group shared this site with us so I came to check it out. Im undoubtedly loving the details. Im book-marking and will likely be tweeting this to my followers! Outstanding weblog and great style and style. 961904

  2. My Homepage says:

    … [Trackback]

    […] There you will find 45897 more Infos: […]

  3. … [Trackback]

    […] Read More: […]

  4. … [Trackback]

    […] Read More here: […]

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s